The article details allegations against Jack Dearborn for illegal withholding of emails, creating a secret classification system, and manipulating zoning decisions in Weare, New Hampshire. It highlights concerns about legal ethics, potential financial misconduct, and attempts to influence zoning processes unfairly.
Main Points
Illegally withholding emails
Jack Dearborn withheld emails and created a secretive classification system to prevent their dissemination, despite legal requests for their release.
Concealment of survey and invoice
Bruce Fillmore’s question to Jack Dearborn about invoicing for a survey reveals potential financial ambiguities and conflicts of interest, leading to unanswered questions about the financial dealings surrounding the survey.
Secret site visit and falsified records
The organization of a secret site visit excluded certain parties and was followed by the falsification of records to misrepresent site conditions, illustrating an attempt to manipulate zoning outcomes.
Insights
Jack Dearborn's actions of withholding emails and creating a secret classification system for emails raise legal and ethical concerns.
Jack Dearborn, a member of the ZBA, withheld emails requested through RSA 91-A and labeled some as ‘attorney client confidential’ without proper basis. This action contradicts open government principles and suggests an attempt to hide information.
The concealment of the survey and its invoice suggests potential financial misconduct or conflict of interest.
Bruce Fillmore’s query to Jack Dearborn about who to invoice for a secret survey raises questions about potential financial misconduct. This is exacerbated by the fact that the survey was not disclosed in response to a legal request, implying a deliberate effort to hide the transaction.
The secretive nature of a second site visit and the falsification of records indicate a deliberate attempt to manipulate zoning decisions.
Jack Dearborn organized a secret second site visit which was not disclosed, and later falsified records about the site’s condition. This behavior suggests an attempt to influence zoning decisions in favor of a specific party, undermining fair and legal processes.
Links
URL
https://wearezoning.com/secret-documents-released/