-
OpenAI has accused The New York Times of paying someone to hack its products, including ChatGPT, as part of a stratagem to establish a lawsuit against the AI maker. The company alleges that The New York Times made numerous attempts to generate anomalies by exploiting a bug in OpenAI’s models to support claims of copyright infringement. Despite the allegations, OpenAI argues that ChatGPT doesn’t serve as a substitute for NYT content. Meanwhile, The New York Times asserts it has found evidence of copyright infringement through OpenAI’s products. The legal battle hinges on complex issues like fair use and copyright laws.
Main Points- Allegations of hacking by NYTOpenAI accuses The New York Times of hacking its products to set up a lawsuit, alleging 'contrived attacks' to gather evidence.
- OpenAI's stance on ChatGPT usageOpenAI argues that ChatGPT is not a substitute for NYT subscriptions, aiming to dismiss the majority of the lawsuit claims.
- NYT's evidence of infringementIan Crosby, counsel for The New York Times, claims substantial evidence of OpenAI's copyright infringement.
122004763